WHY LAZARUS LAUGHED : 81



Metaphysical Analysis

Notes:

a)
I-subject am called 'The Witness' in Vedanta Advaita.
I-subject am directly operative in dhyana (ch'an, zen) from which all intellectual activity is excluded.
I-subject am directly operative in that which Ouspensky termed 'self-remembering'.
I-subject am the Dreamer of my 'life-dream', the 'Father'.

b)
I-dream-subject am a limited aspect of me as I-subject.
I-subject am a limited aspect of me as I-reality.

c)
'III' can be regarded as 'within' 'II', and 'II' as 'within' 'I'.

d)
I-dream-subject and my object are me as I-subject.
I-subject and my objects are ME as I-Reality.
No object is ever me as object - for I am subject/object.
I-dream-subject and I-subject are one with ME as I-Reality.

e)
'we' can be substituted for 'I' without in any way affecting the meaning of the analysis; Reality being One - 'we' are 'I'.

f)
The term 'dream' is used to imply that which is only a concept in consciousness.

g)
The ego-notion is just subjectivity of the dream-subject erroneously applied to the object.

h)
The positive, dynamic element of subject/object is subject only.


(© RKP, 1960)
home/next

* * * * *