How could anything extended in the concepts of 'space' and 'time' be other than a fabrication in mind, as a dream is?
* * *
Existence is subject to Time. How could what-we-are be dependent on sequence in duration?
* * *
Can any metaphysical statement based on a tacit acceptance of space and time be anything but balderdash?
* * *
The seeker is the found, the found is the seeker - as soon as it is apperceived that there is no time.
* * *
All 'being' can only 'be' as a continuity in duration. That is why the Diamond Sutra condemns it as a concept which has no existence as such.
* * *
Phenomena are not extended in space-time objectively, as things in themselves: it is the perceiving which extends them.
* * *
'Sudden enlightenment' means precisely the immediate apperception of all that in fact we are.
'Enlightenment' is 'sudden' only because it is not in 'time' (subject to sequential duration). It re-integration in intemporality.* * *
Apart from the conceptual 'space-time' of relativity in which it is extended - there is nothing for 'form' to be.
* * * * *
